Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 09:49:35 +0200 From: Albert Shih <shih@math.jussieu.fr> To: Massimo Lusetti <massimo@cedoc.mo.it> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.1-R ? 6-Stable ? 5.5-R ? Message-ID: <20060609074935.GA29910@math.jussieu.fr> In-Reply-To: <1149837981.4303.3.camel@massimo.datacode.it> References: <200606090709.k5979fQ9020571@lurza.secnetix.de> <1149837981.4303.3.camel@massimo.datacode.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 09/06/2006 à 09:26:20+0200, Massimo Lusetti a écrit > On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 09:09 +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: > > > No, I meant RELENG_6_1, which is the security fix branch > > for 6.1-Release. Albert wrote that he would prefer not > > to use RELENG_6 (a.k.a. "6-stable") on a production machine, > > therefore my recommendation is RELENG_6_1. > > If read right he is already running a RELENG_6. Well....yes but after many many crash during many mounth I've running a Releng_6 (6 April 2006) and it's don't crash. And I don't have update. Now the server crash yesterday (monday) and I'm asking if it's good idea to update again. > > > Of course, there might be good reasons to run RELENG_6 > > anyway, in case that significant NFS fixes have gone in > > after the release (which I'm not aware of). But that > > decision is up to Albert himself. > > Actually if i remember right the NFS fix are gone in the RELENG_6 and > not in RELENG_6_1 OK, that's mean if I update I need to update to RELENG_6 not RELENG_6_1. Lots of thanks. Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Fri Jun 9 09:46:58 CEST 2006
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060609074935.GA29910>