Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:36:06 -0500 From: "Francisco Reyes" <fran@reyes.somos.net> To: "Nik Clayton" <nik@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-chat@freebsd.org" <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>, "James Howard" <howardjp@well.com>, "netbsd-advocacy@netbsd.org" <netbsd-advocacy@netbsd.org> Subject: Re: Why did NetBSD and FreeBSD diverge? Message-ID: <200101172102.QAA96480@sanson.reyes.somos.net> In-Reply-To: <20010117175244.A34934@canyon.nothing-going-on.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:52:44 +0000, Nik Clayton wrote: >> What I never understood is why "officially" they don't coperate more with >> each other. I believe that unoficially some of the developers >> work/help/contribute to more than one of the BSDs. > >Lots of the developers work on more than one BSD. What would you like >to see in order to make that 'official'? A list, even if minimal, of things which the "architects" (i.e. core on FreeBSD, don't know it's equivalent on NetBSD) agreed to at least consider the other OS. I am not saying they should consult each other for everything, but they could at least keep in other in mind that would be great. >> Does anyone know what ever happened to the push for an unified port >> system? > > http://www.openpackages.org/ That is a very good start on "bringing the BSDs together". francisco Moderator of the Corporate BSD list http://www.egroups.com/group/BSD_Corporate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101172102.QAA96480>