Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Aug 1995 15:50:40 -0400 (EDT)
From:      "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@kryten.Atinc.COM>
To:        "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
Cc:        msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, john@zyqad.co.uk, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Upgrade to my machine
Message-ID:  <Pine.3.89.9508111506.I6515-0100000@kryten.atinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <199508111942.MAA04834@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 11 Aug 1995, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:

> > > XX. BAS DEC3053L Dec/Quantum 535MB 3.5"x1", SCSI-II, 5400 RPM, 9.5mS   $ 195.00
> > 
> > 	rod, this is a great drive and i am very satisfied with mine ;)  
> > it is also a loud drive.  when i hit swap on it, i know immediately.  the 
> > seek motor must be a monster! ;)
> 
> Getting that last .5mS cost a bit in noise.  You should be in a room with
> 10 of those laying out on benches running make worlds on a pile of machines,
> now that is LOUD.

	;)))

> > IOZONE: auto-test mode 
> 
> Pretty typical numbers, but the numbers I use are always for a
> freshly newfs disk using the outer tracks (ie, maximal conditions).
> 
> Your numbers are considerably lower than my 2.4/4.4MB/sec rating
> for the DSP3053L due to file system fragmentation and the fact your
> probably running at about the 250MB mark in on the disk (guessed from
> your numbers :-)).

	at that point the disk had been in constant use for some 5 
months,  must have had 300mb on it at the time

> > bonnie:
> > 
> > /* dont jive with the iozone number very well, do they ? comments ? */
> 
> Was this under identical conditions?

	identical is a pretty strong condition.....the fujitsu drive was 
new at the time so fragmentation was minimal.  at this time, several 
weeks of use it still reports the same bonnie numbers.   


> > disklabels:  NOTE: any misconfiguration here is my fault
> > 		   any recommenations are appreciated
> 
> Actually, any miss configuration on the DSP3053L is _MY_ fault.  That
> is my standard label, I recognize it!

	two points!

> > type: SCSI
> > disk: sd1s1
> 
> This one you can take the blame for, but it is reasonable.

	;)  had a place to take clues from.

> > /* sysinstall put all these partitions off cylinder boundaries.....hmmm */
> 
> You don't have to worry about cyl boundaries inside the BSD slice.

	excellent....but ths slice must be on cyl boundaries ??


Jonathan M. Bresler  jmb@kryten.atinc.com       | Analysis & Technology, Inc.  
FreeBSD Postmaster   jmb@FreeBSD.Org            | 2341 Jeff Davis Hwy
play go.                                        | Arlington, VA 22202
ride bike. hack FreeBSD.--ah the good life      | 703-418-2800 x346




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.3.89.9508111506.I6515-0100000>