Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 21:34:17 +0200 From: "Cyrille Lefevre" <clefevre-lists@9online.fr> To: "Josef Karthauser" <joe@freebsd.org>, "Kay Lehmann" <kay_lehmann@web.de> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade and daemons. Message-ID: <011701c440fe$23b34ac0$7890a8c0@dyndns.org> References: <20040523101300.GA43113@genius.tao.org.uk><40B09066.1020300@web.de> <20040523122832.GF40899@genius.tao.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Josef Karthauser" <joe@freebsd.org> wrote: On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 01:52:06PM +0200, Kay Lehmann wrote: > > As far as I know this isn't the job of portupgrade. Normally it should > be handeled by the port itself, which could stop daemons with > appropriate set (de)install targets. > I think a lot of the ports do this quite properly. Moving this to Mk > looks quite complicated and I think it would be the best to leave it in > the ports, since they should know what is required to do. > Ah ok. That makes sense. Do you know of a port that does this properly off the top of your head? astro/setiathome at post-install time :) Cyrille Lefevre. -- home: mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?011701c440fe$23b34ac0$7890a8c0>