Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 00:37:58 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> To: "Larry S. Lile" <lile@stdio.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, tokenring@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: timeout/untimeout differences in porting from Mach? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980625003453.14853Z-100000@sasami.jurai.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980624222734.10207A-100000@heathers2.stdio.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 24 Jun 1998, Larry S. Lile wrote: > Does anyone have the man pages for timeout/untimeout for Mach? > I am working on the interrupt code for the IBM token-ring card > and don't really understand what the mach code was trying to > do. It looks a bit strange compared to fbsd. If I'm not mistaken its the same purpose as the ifp->if_watchdog routine. The if code calls this depending on the setting of ifp->if_timer. See net/if.c in if_slowtimo() /* Matthew N. Dodd | A memory retaining a love you had for life winter@jurai.net | As cruel as it seems nothing ever seems to http://www.jurai.net/~winter | go right - FLA M 3.1:53 */ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980625003453.14853Z-100000>