Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 08:31:23 +0100 From: Daniel Lang <dl@leo.org> To: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: which ftpd to use? Message-ID: <20030328073123.GB24599@atrbg11.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> In-Reply-To: <20030326143611.GA20796@atrbg11.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> References: <20030326143611.GA20796@atrbg11.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi All,
Daniel Lang wrote on Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 03:36:11PM +0100:
[..]
> I'm looking for recommendations which ftpd to use for our
> heavy loaded server. I would like to support >>1000 connections.
[..]
Thanks all for your response. My first attempts was to try FreeBSD's
native ftpd, which performed very well. >800 connections did result
in _much_ reduced load compared to proftpd with just 300 connections.
Also response time to establish a connection did not degrade.
Due to simplicity, uploads are now no longer possible, but I guess
it's not so much of a problem. I may run an addition ftpd on another
virtual ip just for uploads...
Best regards,
Daniel
--
IRCnet: Mr-Spock - "I hear that, if you play the WindowsXP CD
backwards, you get a Satanic message!"
- "That's nothing. If you play it forward, it installs WindowsXP!"
Daniel Lang * dl@leo.org * +49 89 289 18532 * http://www.leo.org/~dl/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030328073123.GB24599>