Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 16:45:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Justin M. Seger" <jseger@freebsd.scds.com> To: gnat@frii.com Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-mozilla@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Libraries Message-ID: <199804142045.QAA02100@freebsd.scds.com> In-Reply-To: <199804141450.IAA26379@prometheus.frii.com> (gnat@frii.com) References: <199804131525.JAA21474@prometheus.frii.com> <199804140710.AAA02051@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> <199804141450.IAA26379@prometheus.frii.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Urk. What algorithm, then, should autoconf use to (a) find the j. random name of the library, (b) that library's include files, and (c) whether the library+include files are compatible with how it works? (c) is obviously "compile and run a test program" but what about (a) and (b)? Look at ports/graphics/ImageMagick. There are patches in the patches directory that make autoconf correctly identify tiff. TTYL, -Justin Seger- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mozilla" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804142045.QAA02100>