Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 5 Dec 1997 11:13:22 -0500
From:      Mark Mayo <mark@vmunix.com>
To:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Cc:        sos@FreeBSD.dk, Satoshi Asami <asami@cs.berkeley.edu>, Pierre.Beyssac@hsc.fr, grog@lemis.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Should I buy a Cyrix processor?
Message-ID:  <19971205111322.24417@vmunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <28999.881323642@time.cdrom.com>; from Jordan K. Hubbard on Fri, Dec 05, 1997 at 04:07:22AM -0800
References:  <199712051201.NAA08233@sos.freebsd.dk> <28999.881323642@time.cdrom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 05, 1997 at 04:07:22AM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > Actually both 3.5 & 4 works on both my P6's :), it wont run 266Mhz though
> > but 240Mhz (4*60) works just fine ...
> 
> I wonder which is actually faster in practice.  233/66 or 240/60. :-)

Although instinct would tend to say that 233/66 would be faster, results
from Tom's seem to indicate that 240/60 is actually faster.. I think
they are very close though, and I think I'd rather run 233/66 than
240/60 :-)  (it's a tough world, ain't it?  ;-))

-Mark

> 
> 					Jordan

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Mark Mayo		  				mark@vmunix.com       
 RingZero Comp.  	  		    http://www.vmunix.com/mark 

	 finger mark@vmunix.com for my PGP key and GCS code
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Win95/NT - 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to
an an 8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor,
written by a 2 bit company that can't stand 1 bit of competition.  -UGU



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971205111322.24417>