Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Apr 1997 13:25:28 +0100 (BST)
From:      Stephen Roome <steve@visint.co.uk>
To:        Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
Cc:        Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>, Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 430TX ?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.91.970411132308.11730L-100000@bagpuss.visint.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.95.970411165742.6102A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 11 Apr 1997, Michael Hancock wrote:
> While we're talking about Intel, they claim that they're focusing more on
> memory bandwidth these days and the Pentium II has some kind of dual bus
> architecture that makes a significant performance difference.

This is interesting, CTCM (motherboard benchmarker program) seems to tell 
me that I can get almost 56MB/s memory bandwidth. With a 66MHz bus clock 
I can't see how that this figure can improve much. Seeing as Intel seem 
unlikely to support a 75MHz or 83MHz bus speed then I'd love to know how 
they intend on doing this.

--
Steve Roome
Broom Cupboard Stockist, Vision Interactive Ltd.
E: steve@visint.co.uk      M: +44 (0) 976 241 342
T: +44 (0) 117 973 0597    F: +44 (0) 117 923 8522




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.970411132308.11730L-100000>