Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 08:40:37 -0700 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: jsd@jdyson.com, flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org (Miguel Mendez) Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm@toybox.placo.com> Subject: Re: GPL vs BSD Licence Message-ID: <6.1.2.0.2.20041101083738.053d32e8@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200411011532.iA1FWY5s004173@dyson.jdyson.com> References: <20041031105926.4f06b06f.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <200411011532.iA1FWY5s004173@dyson.jdyson.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 08:32 AM 11/1/2004, jsd@jdyson.com wrote: >I don't believe that it is useless to keep the awareness of the >licnese differences alive. It is not at all useless; in fact, it is very important. If the differences are not pointed out, then the GPL and its malicious anti-programmer, anti-business agenda wins by default. If someone preaches that licensing differences are meaningless, then he is either unintentionally or intentionally pushing Stallman's agenda, which includes depriving programmers of a decent living wage (see the "GNU Manifesto".) --Brett Glass
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.1.2.0.2.20041101083738.053d32e8>