Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Aug 1995 18:54:29 -0400 (EDT)
From:      -Vince- <vince@penzance.econ.yale.edu>
To:        "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
Cc:        Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>, john@zyqad.co.uk, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Upgrade to my machine
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.3.91.950811185339.8436W-100000@penzance.econ.yale.edu>
In-Reply-To: <199508110859.BAA03829@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 11 Aug 1995, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:

> ...
> > > 5.  For 1GB disk would 2*500MB disks be preferable to 1*1GB?  Could then
> > > configure 2 swap partitions.
> > 
> > Generally, the 1G disk will perform better than a 1/2 price 500M unit,
> > so two disks is false economy.
> 
> This is absolutly the opposite of the real situation.  2 disk drives of
> 1/2 the size and identical performance characteristecs give you 2 spindles
> that can be doing data trasfer at the same time and with proper load
> balancing gives 2 times the over all performance.  I have sold off _all_
> of my 1 and 2G drives and now stack 535MB 5400RPM 4.4MB/sec drives up to meet
> what ever capacity I need.  My make world times are down 45 minutes or so due
> to running accross 3 disk drives (1 src, 1 obj, 1 system binaries, all
> three have swap areas (but then, with 32MB you never swap during make
> world if nothing else is going on).
> 
> I also happen to be running a fast enough CPU/Memory subsystem that even
> with this setup make world waits for disk I/O 28% of the time :-(.  I have
> the time down to 3 hours 19 minutes (not building profiled libs, and not
> gzipping man pages, A80502-100 w/256K 8nS PB cache, 32MB memory)
> 
> Infact I can sell you more bang for the buck in 535MB 5400 RPM drives right
> now than I can in a 1G drive, not by much, but a few dollars.  And just
> getting your home direcories off the system spindle is a _big_ help in
> system response.
> 
> > > 6.  In a mixed IDE/SCSI system (assumes answer to 1 is yes) can the boot manager
> > > handle booting from the SCSI drive if one of the IDEs is the default boot?
> > 
> > You can only boot from the first two disks in the system.  IDE disks count
> > first, then SCSI, so you can only boot from a SCSI disk if there's only
> > one IDE.
> 
> If you have only scsi disks you can boot from drive 5 if you like, unless
> someone again has broken that piece of code :-(.
> 
> > > I'll upgrade the processor at a later date and put in more memory then.
> > 
> > I'd put your priorities as disk, memory, processor in that order.
> 
> Good rule of thumb.
> 
> > Hope the opinion's some use...
> 
> I hope mine is too...

	Now my question is how do you figure out what the mounting point 
is for each drive? 


Cheers,
-Vince- vince@kbrown.oldcampus.yale.edu - GUS Mailing Lists Admin
UCLA Physics/Electrical Engineering - UC Berkeley Fall '95
SysAdmin bigbang.HIP.Berkeley.EDU - Running FreeBSD, Real UN*X for Free!
Chabot Observatory & Science Center






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.3.91.950811185339.8436W-100000>