Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:32:36 +0300 From: "Artem Kuchin" <matrix@itlegion.ru> To: "Charles Shannon Hendrix" <shannon@widomaker.com>, <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed Message-ID: <000e01c760ef$5d445cc0$0c00a8c0@Artem> References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org><20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <esk9vq$uhh$1@sea.gmane.org><001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <eskka8$adn$1@sea.gmane.org><001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <eskpd1$sm4$1@sea.gmane.org><20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan><esmo7b$lra$1@sea.gmane.org><20070307112308.7da56ccd@daydream.goid.lan><esmpaj$qa0$2@sea.gmane.org> <20070307134918.2ec68ebd@daydream.goid.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Shannon Hendrix" <shannon@widomaker.com> To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 9:49 PM Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed > On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:30:12 +0100 > Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> wrote: > >> Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote: >> > On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:11:24 +0100 >> > Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> wrote: >> > >> >> Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote: >> >> >> >>> BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.1) >> >> Off-topic: Who or what is the origin of the "wht" version? One of the >> >> nice things about unixbench is that it hadn't changed from 1997, but now >> >> most Linux variants use the -wht version that has completely different >> >> baselines and results from the "normal" version? >> > >> > It's a version created for the website: webhostingtalk.com. >> > >> > It was created to have a stable and standard benchmark. >> >> Beautiful - they fiddled with the baselines but still managed not to see >> the obvious problem in execl() call in the execl benchmark for 64-bit >> platform. > > Or maybe they just don't care? > > It seems to me they use the software a lot and it serves their purposes. > It's just a standardized version and run script that they use to evaluate web > servers. Hmm. if the whole world uses wht version of unixbench maybe someone should update freebsd ports version to this wht version, because otherwise we cannot compare anything else than freebsd. Not good. -- Artem
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000e01c760ef$5d445cc0$0c00a8c0>