Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:11:10 -0700
From:      Joshua Oreman <oremanj@webserver.get-linux.org>
To:        Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: kqueue alternative?
Message-ID:  <20030616171110.GC56734@webserver.get-linux.org>
In-Reply-To: <E19RrTD-0006yV-00@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
References:  <1079.10.0.81.10.1055692530.squirrel@www.mundomateo.com> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030615125423.98988D-100000@fledge.watson.org> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030615125423.98988D-100000@fledge.watson.org> <E19RrTD-0006yV-00@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 11:44:15AM +0100 or thereabouts, Tony Finch seemed to write:
> Joshua Oreman <oremanj@webserver.get-linux.org> wrote:
> >On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, Matthew Hagerty wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm writing a little application that needs to watch a file that another
> >> process is writing to, think 'tail -F'.
> >
> >I would say, use select(2).
> >Is there a reason this wouldn't work?
> 
> Select doesn't work with files.

Really? `man 2 select' says nothing about that. It just talks about
'file descriptors'. Now if it said 'socket descriptors' or 'non-file
file descriptors' I would understand, but I don't think that that statement
is implied by the man page. Is there something I'm missing?

-- Josh

> 
> Tony.
> -- 
> f.a.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
> ST DAVIDS HEAD TO COLWYN BAY, INCLUDING ST GEORGES CHANNEL: VARIABLE 2 OR 3
> BECOMING MAINLY SOUTHWEST TO WEST 2 OR 3, LOCALLY 3 OR 4. FAIR WITH ISOLATED
> SHOWERS AND SOME COASTAL MIST PATCHES. GOOD LOCALLY MODERATE OR POOR. SLIGHT.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030616171110.GC56734>