Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:37:19 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Oliver Lehmann <lehmann@ans-netz.de> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: low(er) disk performance with sched_4bsd then with sched_ule Message-ID: <20050915213719.GA26998@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050915181238.54b16b4b.lehmann@ans-netz.de> References: <20050914194612.15692485.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <43286E37.40203@samsco.org> <20050914222013.178dc4dc.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <84dead72050914135239514c49@mail.gmail.com> <20050915000053.448f251b.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <84dead7205091500152a7c25d1@mail.gmail.com> <20050915172005.072f4bdf.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <20050915181238.54b16b4b.lehmann@ans-netz.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--wac7ysb48OaltWcw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 06:12:38PM +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote: > Oliver Lehmann wrote: >=20 > > Joseph Koshy wrote: > >=20 > > > What happens if you use a kernel with 'options NO_ADAPTIVE_MUTEXES' ? > >=20 > > I'll try this and respond back > >=20 >=20 > Hmm, that made it more worse What about using schedgraph as I suggested previously? Kris --wac7ysb48OaltWcw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDKemOWry0BWjoQKURAj6RAJ4s2aleNhLs/wFJG4F7++eAwl5JVwCg9pRx zN6lbW/tiaKrHZVIq6bHAQ0= =jaVB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wac7ysb48OaltWcw--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050915213719.GA26998>