Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Jun 1996 07:35:28 -0700
From:      "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
To:        "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@freebsd.org>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: xditview 
Message-ID:  <292.835108528@time.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 18 Jun 1996 12:14:49 %2B0200." <199606181014.MAA01844@vector.jhs.no_domain> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I seem to recall someone complaining it wouldnt compile if there was no
> X tree resident, could it have been removed just because of that ? !

Well, if ones source tree were 99% X source code free, wouldn't you be
tempted to go for that final 1%? :-)

In any case, I think the handwriting is on the wall for a different
approach to packages like groff and gcc (encapsulation) and, if/when
that happens, things like xditview will magically "come back" for
free.

					Jordan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?292.835108528>