Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:10:42 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/tcpdump print-smb.c Message-ID: <200101241510.KAA60891@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20010123223418.R26076@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <200101240237.f0O2bta29372@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010123223418.R26076@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 22:34:18 -0800, Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> said: > Why not adopt a -ports like system for this where we can have a > set of patchfiles applied to the dist and direct the output to the > OBJDIR? Why don't we just accept that we have a revision control system for a reason, and use it like it was intended to be used, and stop all this BS whining about taking files off the vendor branch. Disk space is cheap. If the conflicts cause a problem when the next version is imported, get the original committer to fix it, or else drop the change. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101241510.KAA60891>