Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 23:22:00 -0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: Jos Backus <josb@cncdsl.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DJBDNS vs. BIND Message-ID: <200102190722.f1J7M0r54717@mobile.wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <20010218220227.H28286@lizzy.bugworks.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jos Backus wrote: > On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 05:47:02AM +0000, Terry Lambert wrote: > > I think the license is a show stopper, anyway. Somwthing so basic > > has got to be locally hackable, > > What kind of hacking do you foresee? It does not matter. The fact that we cannot is a show stopper. We do not have read-only source in our tree, period. If we ever did need to (eg: a compile problem), we could not distribute it. Even the djbdns port is marked FORBIDDEN because of this as it has two tiny patches. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102190722.f1J7M0r54717>