Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:56:58 +0100 From: Spyou <root@spyou.org> To: Pawel Malachowski <pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.9 / VRRP / vlan Message-ID: <6.0.0.22.0.20031127225400.04464cc0@plouf.absolight.com> In-Reply-To: <20031127215426.GA78866@shellma.zin.lublin.pl> References: <6.0.0.22.0.20031127222359.03cf8800@212.43.217.14> <20031127215426.GA78866@shellma.zin.lublin.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 22:54 27/11/2003, Pawel Malachowski wrote: >When moving IP address from R1 to R2, R2 is not able to bring this IP >up cause it already has route to that network in routing table. Is it >possible You have similar problem here? I had this problem a few days ago ... I've found a solution that is not very clean but that works : ether cards have static IP from the subnet (ie 62.233.44.252/24 and=20 62.233.44.253/24) and the virtual IP is declared as /32 in freevrrpd (ie=20 62.233.44.254/32) There's no problem to add the virtual IP as an alias of ether cards .. The problem with OSPF was solved with a perl script that told OSPF's=20 passive router not to announce the subnet to others one This solution (w/o vlans) works .. the downtime is something like 3/4=20 seconds .. wich is acceptable for my applications :) but i can't work w/o vlans :( >-- >Pawe=B3 Ma=B3achowski
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.0.0.22.0.20031127225400.04464cc0>