Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:32:44 -0430 From: Andres Perera <andres.p@zoho.com> To: utisoft@gmail.com Cc: Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com>, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Backtick versus $() Message-ID: <AANLkTim80UGG%2B5%2BFF2drThay7C8vve9mhPVPrqE8p2pG@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimR%2BPY6vWUOpz67V9wM7Sy2-OxaBw-tMFh3Q-LQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTinu1KB=Lz7rsH5TiZXHr61gH8AWFP=quJ9=8iJH@mail.gmail.com> <20110224232404.GA13838@guilt.hydra> <AANLkTik0r5skC0vn0OAGX1_MQDMdsrTK3943iF_rwNzD@mail.gmail.com> <20110225002644.GA14159@guilt.hydra> <AANLkTikBAtV-Yav0oxGaGejmbSdRN4Q3XDCdtdBWBSoP@mail.gmail.com> <20110225010037.GA25929@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <AANLkTimb2dbn8ufyzFharRcFTnhpSGQxcm03FFMgMRhV@mail.gmail.com> <20110225013140.GC14304@guilt.hydra> <AANLkTikD7S8VjQoPwqmiZ8sS-vvfq3Nzk%2B83AKm7UhBr@mail.gmail.com> <20110225021223.GA14459@guilt.hydra> <20110225022430.GA14682@guilt.hydra> <AANLkTimxXKXt7GNZ%2Bg2beOf%2BP_e1gxHr1=WWdR0Nr557@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimR%2BPY6vWUOpz67V9wM7Sy2-OxaBw-tMFh3Q-LQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote: > On 25 February 2011 02:55, Andres Perera <andres.p@zoho.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> wrote: >>> I apologize for the grammaticall brokenness of that sentence. >> >> maybe you should spam the hundreds of subscribers of this mailing list with >> this line: >> >> s,grammaticall,grammatical, >> >> >> jesus christ, you're such a friggen noob > > Before you criticise another's spelling/grammar, perhaps you could > learn where the Shift key is. wow another misguided puppy the keyword here is spamming now think about the differences between a crappy php web forum and a mailing list and how grammar/spelling can be inferred it's not just that you're noobs, but completely ungrateful ones > > Also, some quotes from you (spot the errors): > > and tcsh is inferior to mksh in everyway > > tcsh built uppon that code instead of basing [wow, two in the same sentence] > > been consistently argueing against the opposite > > a buncha noobs is what you both are [paira perhaps] > > > Normally it's considered bad form to attack another's use of language, > but you lose that protection if you pick on others' QWC. > > By the way, there's no such thing as a 'strawman', and perhaps you > could read about ad hominem arguments [1] and how you automatically > lose any arguments where you bring them in. > > Chris > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTim80UGG%2B5%2BFF2drThay7C8vve9mhPVPrqE8p2pG>