Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:11:32 +1100 From: Andrew Reilly <andrew@areilly.bpc-users.org> To: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to compile nautilus with debug symbols from ports? Message-ID: <20061216111132.191479b1@duncan.reilly.home> In-Reply-To: <op.tkl2cf0n9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> References: <20061214085727.15bf3750@duncan.reilly.home> <op.tkl2cf0n9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:18:05 -0600 "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> wrote: > > So: what's happened to nautilus' .core file? Is there some fancy > > clean-up mechanism going on? I imagine so: that must be how > > bugbuddy gets invoked in the first place. Can this be overriden > > so that I can get a core file to point gdb at? > > > > Secondly: is there a convenient port-build global knob for > > turning on debugging symbols? Anything more complicated than > > CFLAGS+=-g in /etc/make.conf? > > See in http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/develfaq.html#q3 for what to put > in make.conf. Summary: no, besides -g in CFLAGS in make.conf we also need STRIP=, to stop the symbol tables from being stripped. However that isn't going to help, because we have to track a completely different "developer" GNOME repository in order to get something that will actually dump a core when it bombs... I'm afraid that last part sounds like too much trouble for this marginally interested user. Sorry. -- Andrew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061216111132.191479b1>