Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 11 Nov 1995 01:49:57 +0200 (EET)
From:      "Andrew V. Stesin" <stesin@elvisti.kiev.ua>
To:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Shouldn't DB library be updated?
Message-ID:  <199511102349.BAA26593@office.elvisti.kiev.ua>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
That's about Berkeley DB library.

The one in --stable is 1.74; the one on ftp.cs.berkeley.edu is 1.85,
and seems to be fairly stable (or non-maintained?) implementation.
The list of changes and bugfixes between 1.74 and 1.85 is sugnificant.

I've compiled 1.85 under recent 2.1 SNAP; compiles easy (minor tweaking
with includes), regression tests ran smooth, works fine and seems
to be faster on heavy-weight Btree operations comparing to 1.74 version.

Maybe it worth updating?

-- 

	With best regards -- Andrew Stesin.

	+380 (44) 2760188	+380 (44) 2713457	+380 (44) 2713560

	An undocumented feature is a coding error.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199511102349.BAA26593>