Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)


2019/freebsd-arch/20190217.freebsd-arch

Messages: 34, sorted by author
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:14:43 2023

home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
  1. Feb 14 Ben Widawsky               Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature
  2. Feb 14 Bruce Evans                 Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature
  3. Feb 14 Bruce Evans                 Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature
  4. Feb 12 Conrad Meyer               RFC: What to do about VOP_INACTIVE?
  5. Feb 14 Conrad Meyer                Re: RFC: What to do about VOP_INACTIVE?
  6. Feb 15 Cy Schubert                Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature
  7. Feb 11 Daniel Eischen             Re: switch to non-zero PTHREAD_*_INITIALIZER
  8. Feb 10 Jason Harmening            Any desire for a more flexible bus_dmamem_alloc variant ?
  9. Feb 12 Jason Harmening             Re: Any desire for a more flexible bus_dmamem_alloc variant ?
 10. Feb 14 Johannes Lundberg          Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature
 11. Feb 15 Johannes Lundberg           Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature
 12. Feb 15 Johannes Lundberg           Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature
 13. Feb 11 John Baldwin               Re: Any desire for a more flexible bus_dmamem_alloc variant ?
 14. Feb 12 Konstantin Belousov        Re: RFC: What to do about VOP_INACTIVE?
 15. Feb 14 Konstantin Belousov         Re: RFC: What to do about VOP_INACTIVE?
 16. Feb 11 Konstantin Belousov        Re: switch to non-zero PTHREAD_*_INITIALIZER
 17. Feb 14 Niclas Zeising             Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature
 18. Feb 15 Oliver Pinter               Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature
 19. Feb 12 Poul-Henning Kamp          Re: RFC: What to do about VOP_INACTIVE?
 20. Feb 11 Poul-Henning Kamp          Re: switch to non-zero PTHREAD_*_INITIALIZER


21. Feb 11 Poul-Henning Kamp switch to non-zero PTHREAD_*_INITIALIZER 22. Feb 12 Rick Macklem Re: What to do about VOP_INACTIVE? 23. Feb 14 Steve Kargl "DRM removal soon" is premature 24. Feb 14 Steve Kargl Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature 25. Feb 14 Steve Kargl Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature 26. Feb 14 Steve Kargl Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature 27. Feb 14 Steve Kargl Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature 28. Feb 15 Steve Kargl Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature 29. Feb 14 Warner Losh DRM removal soon 30. Feb 14 Warner Losh Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature 31. Feb 14 Warner Losh Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature 32. Feb 14 Warner Losh Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature 33. Feb 14 Warner Losh Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature 34. Feb 15 parker@iownkeywords.com Re: Email address not in use


home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date