Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)


2019/freebsd-arch/20190217.freebsd-arch

Messages: 34, old messages first
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:14:43 2023

home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
  1. Feb 10 Jason Harmening            Any desire for a more flexible bus_dmamem_alloc variant ?
  2. Feb 11 Poul-Henning Kamp          switch to non-zero PTHREAD_*_INITIALIZER
  3. Feb 11 Konstantin Belousov        Re: switch to non-zero PTHREAD_*_INITIALIZER
  4. Feb 11 Poul-Henning Kamp          Re: switch to non-zero PTHREAD_*_INITIALIZER
  5. Feb 11 Daniel Eischen             Re: switch to non-zero PTHREAD_*_INITIALIZER
  6. Feb 11 John Baldwin               Re: Any desire for a more flexible bus_dmamem_alloc variant ?
  7. Feb 12 Conrad Meyer               RFC: What to do about VOP_INACTIVE?
  8. Feb 12 Rick Macklem               Re: What to do about VOP_INACTIVE?
  9. Feb 12 Jason Harmening            Re: Any desire for a more flexible bus_dmamem_alloc variant ?
 10. Feb 12 Konstantin Belousov        Re: RFC: What to do about VOP_INACTIVE?
 11. Feb 12 Poul-Henning Kamp          Re: RFC: What to do about VOP_INACTIVE?
 12. Feb 14 Warner Losh                DRM removal soon
 13. Feb 14 Conrad Meyer               Re: RFC: What to do about VOP_INACTIVE?
 14. Feb 14 Steve Kargl                "DRM removal soon" is premature
 15. Feb 14 Warner Losh                Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature
 16. Feb 14 Steve Kargl                Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature
 17. Feb 14 Niclas Zeising             Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature
 18. Feb 14 Konstantin Belousov        Re: RFC: What to do about VOP_INACTIVE?
 19. Feb 14 Warner Losh                Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature
 20. Feb 14 Steve Kargl                Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature


21. Feb 14 Warner Losh Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature 22. Feb 14 Steve Kargl Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature 23. Feb 14 Bruce Evans Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature 24. Feb 14 Bruce Evans Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature 25. Feb 14 Johannes Lundberg Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature 26. Feb 14 Ben Widawsky Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature 27. Feb 14 Steve Kargl Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature 28. Feb 14 Warner Losh Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature 29. Feb 15 parker@iownkeywords.com Re: Email address not in use 30. Feb 15 Johannes Lundberg Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature 31. Feb 15 Oliver Pinter Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature 32. Feb 15 Johannes Lundberg Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature 33. Feb 15 Steve Kargl Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature 34. Feb 15 Cy Schubert Re: "DRM removal soon" is premature


home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date