Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 21:48:16 +0200 From: J <mailinglists-freebsd-questions@927589452.de> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: J <mailinglists-freebsd-questions@927589452.de> Subject: Re: IPv6-only network--is NAT64+DNS64 really this easy now? Message-ID: <20190626194816.qi53z5q7l5immepn@deathbolt.927589452.space> In-Reply-To: <14695ff8-9796-4b4d-457e-e48818600745@bluerosetech.com> References: <5e24739b-bbd0-d94a-5b0e-53fdeba81245@bluerosetech.com> <CANJ8om6WmNQWibnSCMR2hf09he-wWBUnBmY5Mnn7%2BNtvUHhcBQ@mail.gmail.com> <19784363-6543-ccc1-b13f-5f1a67dc10d1@bluerosetech.com> <20190625071943.vwswhj2lh6ctj4vy@deathbolt.927589452.space> <14695ff8-9796-4b4d-457e-e48818600745@bluerosetech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19-06-26 11:48:05, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > On 2019-06-25 0:19, mailinglists-freebsd-questions@927589452.de wrote: > > But i don't understand why you would use a NAT64, as one of the reasons > > to use IPv6 is not needing a NAT > > NAT64 is not the same thing as NAT44 or NAT66 (the kind of NAT to which > "IPv6 doesn't require NAT" refers). thanks for clarifying, didn't realize it
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190626194816.qi53z5q7l5immepn>