Date: Sun, 26 Mar 1995 19:15:41 +0100 From: Gary Palmer <gary@palmer.demon.co.uk> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.cdrom.com> Cc: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@kryten.Atinc.COM>, FreeBSD Ports <FreeBSD-Ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: 2.1 ports testing (was Re: expect & majordomo requests (fwd)) Message-ID: <184.796241741@palmer.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 24 Mar 1995 12:01:16 PST." <18247.796075276@freefall.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <18247.796075276@freefall.cdrom.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: >I have no objections if you want to be that detailed about it. Sure! I dunno if we can formulate a (workable) system for alpha'ing ports, but the tree should be tagged & branched at least... Anyone have any ideas how we could test the majority of ports on the branch without someone (i.e. one person) going through the tree one port at a time? Gary
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?184.796241741>