Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2001 10:13:50 +0930 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: Bernd Walter <ticso@mail.cicely.de> Cc: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>, lecn1306@ele.etsmtl.ca, freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Vinum status Message-ID: <20010408101350.F76422@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <20010407211657.B4055@cicely20.cicely.de>; from ticso@mail.cicely.de on Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 09:16:57PM %2B0200 References: <3ACB7215.F40BE906@ele.etsmtl.ca> <20010407172348.A76422@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20010407075917.A7354@dragon.nuxi.com> <3ACB7215.F40BE906@ele.etsmtl.ca> <20010407172348.A76422@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20010407211657.B4055@cicely20.cicely.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday, 7 April 2001 at 21:16:57 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 07:59:18AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 05:23:48PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: >>> +/* XXX kludge until we get this struct cleaned up */ >>> +#if _KERNEL >>> dev_t dev; /* device information */ >> >> What do you mean by "until we get this struct cleaned up"? >> PHK and Mike Smith explained what dev_t in the kernel (plus udev_t) vs. >> dev_t in userland are. I saw no indication that was going to change. > > I asume exactly what Greg wrote: > On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 05:23:48PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: > [...] >> tends to obfuscate the code. As others have observed, a better >> solution would be to remove the dev_t from the expurgated version of >> the struct. I have some code in preparation which does this, so it >> really doesn't seem to make any sense to change so much code. Correct. Greg -- Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010408101350.F76422>