Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 11:15:47 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org> Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/26787: sysctl change request Message-ID: <24848.991127747@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 28 May 2001 18:10:03 PDT." <200105290110.f4T1A3u68170@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200105290110.f4T1A3u68170@freefall.freebsd.org>, Dima Dorfman writes: > Either you misunderstood, or I'm missing something really, really big. > I meant that each *handler* should decide how to log it, not each > sysctl instance. Ok, I misunderstood you there. > I've attached a proof-of-concept patch to demonstrate what I mean; Looks good. > At this point, it only logs the last component > of the sysctl (e.g., if the sysctl is "kern.hostname" it will only log > "hostname") because I couldn't find a routine which gave the full > name, and writing one wasn't necessary to demonstrate the concept. Right, we don't have such a routine at this point. > Do you still think this would add too much bloat for too little gain? If it's something on this size I am all for it. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?24848.991127747>