Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 11:04:59 -0700 From: Eric Melville <eric@FreeBSD.org> To: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> Cc: Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.org>, binup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: design issues Message-ID: <20011016110459.F4211@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20011016190223.I83396@tao.org.uk>; from joe@tao.org.uk on Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 07:02:23PM %2B0100 References: <20011014170515.B39749@FreeBSD.org> <20011014180507.D2654@windriver.com> <20011015020834.Y31066@tao.org.uk> <20011014181709.E2654@windriver.com> <20011015023057.A31066@tao.org.uk> <20011016110056.E4211@FreeBSD.org> <20011016190223.I83396@tao.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> None. The point is 'tools not policy'. It should be possible to > separate the backend database description from the implementation of the > package system so that anything is possible. At the moment it's not > possible to do anything other than use /var/db/pkg/. I'm not saying > that it should be default. I'm saying that it should be possible. I see, I misread the previous comment. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-binup" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011016110459.F4211>