Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 04:12:17 +0100 From: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be> To: Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org>, Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be> Cc: FreeBSD Chat <chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: GPL nonsense: time to stop Message-ID: <a0510100ab84462d33740@[10.0.1.39]> In-Reply-To: <20011218131351.M21649@monorchid.lemis.com> References: <20011218121011.E21649@monorchid.lemis.com> <a05101009b8445a0a2848@[10.0.1.39]> <20011218131351.M21649@monorchid.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 1:13 PM +1030 on 2001/12/18, Greg Lehey wrote: > Read what it says: > >> The kernel code released under the revised BSD license will continue >> to be under the revised BSD license; it is only the *combination as >> a whole* that will be covered by the GPL--if and when the >> GPL-covered code is included in it. If someone links a kernel >> without that GPL-covered code, the GPL won't apply to that kernel. > > What part of that don't you understand? I read that. As soon as the GPL-covered code is included in the kernel, then the "*combination as a whole*" is covered by the GPL, which creates precisely the situation we want to avoid. It's no problem for those of us on the pure open source side, who would be providing the source code anyway. However, this is a deal-killer for any commercial project. -- Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be> H4sICIFgXzsCA2RtYS1zaWcAPVHLbsMwDDvXX0H0kkvbfxiwVw8FCmzAzqqj1F4dy7CdBfn7 Kc6wmyGRFEnvvxiWQoCvqI7RSWTcfGXQNqCUAnfIU+AT8OZ/GCNjRVlH0bKpguJkxiITZqes MxwpSucyDJzXxQEUe/ihgXqJXUXwD9ajB6NHonLmNrUSK9nacHQnH097szO74xFXqtlbT3il wMsBz5cnfCR5cEmci0Rj9u/jqBbPeES1I4PeFBXPUIT1XDSOuutFXylzrQvGyboWstCoQZyP dxX4dLx0eauFe1x9puhoi0Ao1omEJo+BZ6XLVNaVpWiKekxN0VK2VMpmAy+Bk7ZV4SO+p1L/ uErNRS/qH2iFU+iNOtbcmVt9N16lfF7tLv9FXNj8AiyNcOi1AQAA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a0510100ab84462d33740>