Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 20:12:24 +1300 From: Andrew Thompson <andy@fud.org.nz> To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPF & IPFW Message-ID: <3E3B7358.8070401@fud.org.nz> In-Reply-To: <200302010224.58228.ianjhart@ntlworld.com> References: <20030131222558.61732.qmail@web14105.mail.yahoo.com> <20030201011921.GE30498@blossom.cjclark.org> <3E3B2511.6090009@fud.org.nz> <200302010224.58228.ianjhart@ntlworld.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
ian j hart wrote: >On Saturday 01 February 2003 1:38 am, Andrew Thompson wrote: > > >>Crist J. Clark wrote: >> >> >>Thanks everyone for your help, >> >>The bit I was having trouble with was doing two transparent proxies >>depending if the user had logged in or not, one to squid, the other to a >>static page telling them to log in. I have actually reworked my ipfw >>rules so I dont need ipf anymore and its all working. :) >> >>This thread can be dropped unless you all want to discuss the ordering >>more. IMHO Christ is right. >> >> > >Who's arguing? > >Your original query was not specific enough. > Mabey..... My question was simply "is there an easy way to change the order of the two?", which people were quite happy to answer, the address munging wasnt directly relevant. But I will try to be more verbose in the future :) >= >I am writing an app to do pre-pay internet and are using a combination >of ipf and ipfw. I stupidly assumed that ipfw ran before ipf, of course >its the other way around. This has put a hurdle in my design, is there >an easy way to change the order of the two? or do I need to redesign :( >= > >All I was pointing out is a "loophole". If source address munging is what >you wanted, I'd have been right :)) > > > Yerp :)) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E3B7358.8070401>