Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 14:46:11 -0500 (CDT) From: "Sean C. Farley" <scf@FreeBSD.org> To: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: new linux infrastructure ports are committed Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904021444010.20710@thor.farley.org> In-Reply-To: <20090402183346.GA32707@freebsd.org> References: <23488525@bb.ipt.ru> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904021222330.20710@thor.farley.org> <20090402183346.GA32707@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Roman Divacky wrote: > On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 12:33:42PM -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote: >> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Boris Samorodov wrote: >> >>> Hello List, >>> >>> I've just committed new Linux Fedora 8 infrastructure ports. That >>> was a long awaited commit. Thanks for all who helped me here. 47 new >>> ports are introduced as well as a new linux ports infrastructure >>> which made it possible to co-exist ports from different linux >>> distros at our ports tree. The worked lasted for more than a year. >> >> Thank you to all involved. >> >> *snip* >> >>> As you may already know, only 8-CURRENT is compatible with >>> compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.16. FreeBSD-7.x is not fully compatible >>> due to lack of some syscalls, etc. Those syscalls cannot be MFCed >>> due to native FreeBSD ABI breakage. Some applications may work fine >>> though. >> >> What cannot be MFC'd besides TLS and NPTL? For syscalls that cannot >> be > > linuxulator in RELENG_7 supports TLS/NPTL Hmm. I thought it was, but the wiki said otherwise. Maybe the wiki is referring to MFC'ing to RELENG_6? Sean -- scf@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0904021444010.20710>