Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:50:58 +0300 From: Alexander V. Chernikov <melifaro@freebsd.org> To: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: "freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ipfw delete 100-300 Message-ID: <925201438613458@web7h.yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <20150803234952.O17327@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <55BF368A.60004@elischer.org> <20150803234952.O17327@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
03.08.2015, 17:14, "Ian Smith" <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>: > On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 17:38:18 +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > š> my reading of the code I can see that 'ipfw delete 100-300' doesn't > š> work (well I know it doesn't work, but I had thought it was a bug), > š> Now I see that its just 'not supported' I implemented the kernel range deletion, but converted userland part as-is. Should work on HEAD now (r286232). > š> > š> It may be my imagination but (distant) past? > > I was surprised too; ISTR having used that before too, but I may > misremember remembering .. I also had a feeling that this syntax should work (maybe because it silently accepted "ranged" queries) but I couldn't find any presence of real ranged deletion support in SVN. > > On 9.3 with rules 100-1000 in 100's, 'ipfw delete 600-800' deletes only > 600 .. without complaint, returning 0 if 600 existed. NG for scripts. > > cheers, Ian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?925201438613458>