Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 6 Sep 2019 16:28:36 -0600
From:      "@lbutlr" <kremels@kreme.com>
To:        Aleksandr via freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Convert MBR Partitions to GPT
Message-ID:  <668AE706-2B7D-40F9-B88A-208797D419BB@kreme.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190906234411.9aba1e00.freebsd@edvax.de>
References:  <1ef6d7eb-a7c9-2a5d-12b2-20c4ef255523@wavecable.com> <20190902133941.e563291f.freebsd@edvax.de> <0e0c086c-a907-d224-98b8-9486d921e7a5@wavecable.com> <20190902141116.264edd01.freebsd@edvax.de> <88cabc53-eff5-3e1a-6e77-2d86da2b8c8d@wavecable.com> <20190902164836.98486301.freebsd@edvax.de> <c071bbe0-75dd-7ab3-1a05-e965969bb299@wavecable.com> <20190906132003.a0e2c6a0.freebsd@edvax.de> <C7372CDC-871E-4E2F-86C1-6EF3EA1F9CD9@kreme.com> <20190906234411.9aba1e00.freebsd@edvax.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6 Sep 2019, at 15:44, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 12:25:21 -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
>> On 6 Sep 2019, at 05:20, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> wrote:
>>> Now, journaling tends to cause problems when using dump to backup
>>> data partition-wise (e. g., "dump -0Lauf /mnt/rootfs.dmp =
/dev/ada0p2=E2=80=9D).
>>=20
>> I=E2=80=99m not sure that is a problem with journaling as opposed to =
a problem
>> with dump.
>=20
> I'm not primarily complaining about the problems between journaling
> and dump, I'm complaining because the _choice_ is gone (or at least
> choice now requires additional booting and fiddling with what has been
> possible with ye olde sysinstall for decades).

The defaults are always going to annoy some people. I=E2=80=99d say =
using dump for backup seems like it=E2=80=99s pretty much and edge case =
these days.

>> Pick one fo the following:
>>=20
>> 1. Journaling and rsync/tar/etc
>> 2. ZFS Journaling/snapshots and dump to your heart's content
>> 3. Use an older disk format
>=20
> This is not always possible. Imagine a setting where you need to
> introduce a new UFS-based system to a conglomerate where dumps are
> obtained automatically at runtime. None (!) of the things listed
> above is a solution.

Why does it have to be UFS and why can=E2=80=99t you manually format the =
disk if you really care that much?



--=20
MY MOM IS NOT DATING JERRY SIENFELD Bart chalkboard Ep. AABF06=20




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?668AE706-2B7D-40F9-B88A-208797D419BB>