Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 20:39:55 -0700 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> Cc: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em bad performance Message-ID: <43AF660B.1030506@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0512251114u6cdbb439j3cb6e3ec07f97189@mail.gmail.com> References: <jfvogel@gmail.com> <2a41acea0512220941y61c9b5acs8053e6df8a96a1e4@mail.gmail.com> <E1Eph9s-0002F4-8O@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> <2a41acea0512251114u6cdbb439j3cb6e3ec07f97189@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jack Vogel wrote: > On 12/22/05, Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> wrote: > > >>iperf -c host >> >>i'm begining to believe that the problem is elsewhere, i just put in >>an ethernet nic in a PCI-X/Express slot, and the performance is similar, bad. >> >>danny > > > Hmm, not some silly like getting set to half duplex? :) > > Jack Isn't 'half duplex' meaningless in the gigabit link protocol? Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43AF660B.1030506>