Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 13:34:46 +0100 From: Jan Bramkamp <crest@rlwinm.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenRC 0.35 for FreeBSD Message-ID: <e74f8ce3-fab5-bac6-65b0-c77799cf5ac3@rlwinm.de> In-Reply-To: <35AC3784-D02B-4EB1-9F82-E522B7A7730E@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAFvkmYNBtH-MizOLVnSR0c5VuYRpYEDpyWig2x%2By7PM6rQkL=A@mail.gmail.com> <20180302083756.GH34685@e.0x20.net> <BE852FF1-A856-4913-93CA-3F7F67DEB855@FreeBSD.org> <35AC3784-D02B-4EB1-9F82-E522B7A7730E@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02.03.18 17:11, Jonathan Anderson wrote: > On 2 Mar 2018, at 12:13, Jonathan Anderson wrote: >> >> [...] there are a number of options that I've heard of vying for >> consideration: >> >> - finit >> - jobd (is this still a thing?) >> - nosh >> - OpenRC >> - runit > > Oh, and also s6: https://skarnet.org/software/s6/why.html I've run s6 + s6-rc as init replacement for FreeBSD 11.1 on my laptop for over a year. The init_path kenv simplifies testing alternative init systems a lot. It works really well and required only minimal porting.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e74f8ce3-fab5-bac6-65b0-c77799cf5ac3>