Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 08:50:23 -0700 From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@ixsystems.com> To: Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ZFS API Message-ID: <8F48CD13-B7BD-4261-8CE4-BBB59CAC473C@ixsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <3A396786-4010-4934-AA12-9DBC87392D99@sarenet.es> References: <1422065A4E115F409E22C1EC9EDAFBA46044E4@sofdc01exc02.postbank.bg> <1422065A4E115F409E22C1EC9EDAFBA4604B35@sofdc01exc02.postbank.bg> <757ED2D6-0585-43C1-B827-FB349045246A@pingpong.net> <1422065A4E115F409E22C1EC9EDAFBA4604B8D@sofdc01exc02.postbank.bg> <5433F7B5.8090604@bytecamp.net> <7BD1DA91-6667-4183-B4C2-297FA1602703@sarenet.es> <20141008150054.GD25906@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <3A396786-4010-4934-AA12-9DBC87392D99@sarenet.es>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Oct 8, 2014, at 8:04 AM, Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es> wrote: >=20 > I know, again it's not exactly the optimal way to do it. Call me = old-fashioned :) I can=E2=80=99t help but feel that if even half the energy that has gone = into this discussion were instead directed towards actually *addressing = the problem*, the problem would be well on its way towards being = addressed right now. In other words, the code does not care about this philosophical = discussion. If someone wants to have a robust, well-supported API for = ZFS, then they (the person who wants it, ideally, since motivation is = 9/10ths of the battle) should work on making that happen. The OpenZFS project has been pretty good about accepting contributions. = Its biggest challenge is simply that there aren=E2=80=99t enough people = volunteering to contribute. My sensors detect a potential volunteer. :) - Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8F48CD13-B7BD-4261-8CE4-BBB59CAC473C>