Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:23:33 -0600
From:      Anti <fearow@attbi.com>
To:        Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de>
Cc:        des@ofug.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: -O2 considered harmful
Message-ID:  <20030226172333.5aed8fec.fearow@attbi.com>
In-Reply-To: <3E5CADDE.9060900@liwing.de>
References:  <xzpy943xnhx.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <3E5CADDE.9060900@liwing.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:06:54 +0100
Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de> wrote:

> Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > It seems that with -O2 on ia32 (-march=k6-2 in my case), gcc will in
> > some cases generate short jumps to targets too far away for the offset
> > to fit in a single byte.  A surefire way to reproduce this is to build
> > Mesa (or XFree86-4-libraries, which includes parts of Mesa).
> > 
> > Has anybody else run into this?
> > 
> 
> I build world and ports on desktop machines usually using -O2 and never 
> got any problems, except with lang/ezm3. If you tell me, where you've 
> find the problems, I'll tell my gcc to keep the temporaries and check 
> them after a make build.


you need to add "-fno-schedule-insns2" to your CFLAGS to compile ezm3 with
-O2...


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030226172333.5aed8fec.fearow>