Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 09:02:03 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@chello.cz> To: Glenn Sieb <ges+lists@wingfoot.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questionable statement in article Message-ID: <20040811070203.GA678@isis.wad.cz> In-Reply-To: <4119A4DA.1050700@wingfoot.org> References: <1091989450.570.2.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> <20040808202351.GV87690@submonkey.net> <41168DF7.2090601@wingfoot.org> <4116906E.8060408@elvandar.org> <4116ED12.3000809@wingfoot.org> <20040810181651.GA4929@isis.wad.cz> <411916DB.3060307@wingfoot.org> <20040810192520.GB4929@isis.wad.cz> <4119A4DA.1050700@wingfoot.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# ges+lists@wingfoot.org / 2004-08-11 00:47:22 -0400:
> Roman Neuhauser said the following on 8/10/2004 3:25 PM:
>
> > I see you mix "in BSD" with "for BSD" as you see fit for your
> > argument. Yes, Apache *is* developed *in BSD*, besides other
> > operating systems (and *for* BSD, besides other operating systems).
>
> Not intentionally, Roman. Don't see attacks where there are none.
Please accepty my apology.
> So let's put the knives down and discuss things that maybe we can do to
> help encourage vendors to make their software available for BSD.
No amount of armchair discussion will move a vendor to increase
their development and maintenance costs by supporting more operating
systems. You need to vote with your money, and make sure the vendor
knows they lost a deal because of lack of support for your operating
system of choice.
That's about all I can contribute to this topic.
--
FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE
8:50AM up 53 mins, 1 user, load averages: 0.02, 0.03, 0.00
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040811070203.GA678>