Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:29:40 -0700
From:      "Steve Franks" <stevefranks@ieee.org>
To:        "Kevin Kinsey" <kdk@daleco.biz>,  "FreeBSD Mailing List" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: new vanilla system fails to install many packages/ports
Message-ID:  <539c60b90807241729y6d88e899g5d2acd739c6ad65e@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <48891697.707@daleco.biz>
References:  <539c60b90807241547x6abefbaepc8ce9a84784b44d5@mail.gmail.com> <48891697.707@daleco.biz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Kevin Kinsey <kdk@daleco.biz> wrote:
> Steve Franks wrote:
>>
>> I must be missing something obvious.  About 25% of my dependencies
>> fail to install with errors like:
>>
>> "install-info: /usr/local/info/dir: empty file"
>> "pkg-add: command 'install-info --quiet /blah.info' failed"
>>
>> system is 7.0/i386
>>
>> Steve
>
> "info" is GNU-related.  Any reason that GNU-stuff, esp.
> "info", wouldn't have been installed/built thus far?
> (I dunno, but, maybe a csup with the GNU stuff rejected
> or commented out ...)
>

All I did was a "developer" (not x developer) sysinstall off 7.0 disk
1.  No tweaking, hacking, or extra packages until I got a clean boot
onto the new disk.  I'm somewhere between user and power user.  I have
5 running freebsd systems under my belt, and was going to do my laptop
(I've given up on it several times already - bloody compaq).

> And anything these ports have in common (assuming they're
> all GNU for starters).  They aren't Linuxolator stuff?
>

Seems to me, they all use gnuinfo instead of manpages?  I don't even
know what gnuinfo is, nor linuxulator.

(!) Bison won't even install (makes fine, but install fails), and
that's pretty darn basic, no?

Steve



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?539c60b90807241729y6d88e899g5d2acd739c6ad65e>