Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 14:57:55 +0100 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: Steven Kreuzer <skreuzer@freebsd.org>, Roman Bogorodskiy <novel@freebsd.org>, artur@unix.net.pl, Erwin Lansing <erwin@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PearPC port broken? Message-ID: <BANLkTikN-DU95RiAQQXggFO5sLEqjRT0FQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTim3Xvd8%2BcK960z=V89586u1FROJAw@mail.gmail.com> References: <20110413215728.17370cfa.artur@unix.net.pl> <BANLkTim7=o=Oi5hf=-K%2BDSMqc1TQ99O2ag@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTim3Xvd8%2BcK960z=V89586u1FROJAw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15 April 2011 19:28, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote: > On 15 April 2011 18:41, Steven Kreuzer <skreuzer@freebsd.org> wrote: >> I just ran pearpc through a 8.2 amd64 tinderbox and it bombed out. >> Looks like whatever is causing it not to compile in 8 has been fixed >> in 9. We can change the port so thats its only marked as broken if the >> OS is not >= 9 >> > > Looks fine for me too, on 8.2-RELEASE [1]. > > Erwin, you marked it BROKEN, but I can't find any error logs, and > portsmon's drawing a blank.... could it have been transient? > > I'm running it through a tinderbox now on 7.4 [2]. > > Chris > Mystery solved-- missing dependency on nasm. I'll run it again and submit a patch. Chris [1] http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/tinderlogs/pearpc-f7.4.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTikN-DU95RiAQQXggFO5sLEqjRT0FQ>