Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 22:44:27 +0200 From: Thomas Zander <thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is ATH_ENABLE_11N supposed to work on 9-stable? Message-ID: <CAFU734z_PPQZ4x4dhQEKkhYJmgYq=EPchRtH0evxvNzHqXJF%2Bw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=fzxfSZhmCzzQog%2BvnXw5LS%2Bh32PUDLaVOdSNTHcNiGg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAFU734yKTSW94MESwiHc5VC0==%2Ba4RdG47QYRxV9ZNY_Xm-T_Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmo=fzxfSZhmCzzQog%2BvnXw5LS%2Bh32PUDLaVOdSNTHcNiGg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14 July 2013 18:41, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > Nope. It's a -10 thing. Okay, thanks for clarifying. Riggs
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFU734z_PPQZ4x4dhQEKkhYJmgYq=EPchRtH0evxvNzHqXJF%2Bw>