Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Nov 2000 08:44:38 -0600
From:      "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>
To:        Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: res_ functions thread safe?
Message-ID:  <20001121084438.B77911@spawn.nectar.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011211330010.23317-100000@iclub.nsu.ru>; from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru on Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 01:31:06PM %2B0600
References:  <20001121070238.A19849@hand.dotat.at> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011211330010.23317-100000@iclub.nsu.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 01:31:06PM +0600, Max Khon wrote:
> if I understand correctly nsswitch patches implement getxxx_r functions as
> well

Yes, but they have to live `on top of' the existing resolver. :-(
-- 
Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001121084438.B77911>