Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 6 Oct 1998 00:52:40 -0400
From:      beef@cybertouch.org
To:        chat@FreeBSD.ORG, Marty Cawthon <mrc@ChipChat.com>
Subject:   Re: Linux vs BSD
Message-ID:  <199810060452.AAA02803@beef.cybertouch.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OS2.3.96.981005223607.124B-100000@MRC-Tiger.chipchat.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Date sent:      	Mon, 5 Oct 1998 23:18:40 -0400 (EDT)
From:           	Marty Cawthon <mrc@ChipChat.com>
To:             	chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:        	Linux vs BSD

> Hello BSDaemons,
> 
> BACKGROUND
>   I frequently encounter the question "Linux vs BSD" from people who use
> neither. 

	If they have seen neither, and you want to promote FreeBSD, 
why would you point to another OS?

A simple question, but without a simple answer. A credible answer
> requires a person well versed in both systems without a 'religious' bias.
> 
>   In discussing this topic with two of my brothers it occurred to me just
> how much is actually common to both systems. For example, an end-user
> sees the same X11R6 in each case (recompiled for each O.S.), the same
> Bash, a programmer uses the same gcc, an administrator uses the same
> sendmail, named, samba, etc.

  If that is the case then why not compare to AIX or SCO? 

> 
> IDEA
>   I think a web page that lists, side by side, many of the components of a
> "Linux Distribution" and that of a FreeBSD 'distribution' (and NetBSD and
> OpenBSD) might be very interesting, and a useful reference for discussing
> "Linux vs BSD". Such a web page would show, without bias or bashing, just
> how much is in common, and just what is different.
> 

	If I were doing the marketing with FreeBSD, I would not at any 
initial stage, put ANYONE elses name beside FreeBSD. What you 
want to do is to get the NAME FreeBSD to be synonymous with 
UNIX. In the same way we (or most of us anyway, refer to 
Kleenex). This business of comparison between different systems 
will just lead to fights. And that is a total waste of time. I don't 
know how old linux is, but there are commercial apps around for it. 
If you happen to be good at making programs, why not spend the 
time to make not good, but great commercial applications for 
FreeBSD. Applications that are useful to companies or the general 
public are the second best way of getting more people to buy 
FreeBSD. Obviously the best way to get people to buy FreeBSD is 
by word of mouth. 

	I for one have a future brother-in-law who sells networking to 
companies. He is from the "old school" where in University he was 
doing cobol. His idea of unix is "Lanny you want to still use the 
horse and cart when the rest of the world is driving cars"? That got 
me mad as hell. I have been trying to learn FreeBSD for over 2 
years. As you can see from this mail, it is sent from Pegaus. The 
thing is, it is sent not to my isp but to my FreeBSD box sitting or 
purring rather, beside me here. Now I can invite him to my condo to 
show him what "the cart and horse can do". As I type this letter I 
am able to play mp3's via samba, use microsoft word7 again, via 
samba. Things he said can't be done with out throwing tons of 
hardware to a unix machine. 

	He says he gets SCO unix for clients that need Unix systems. 
I want to prove to him that FreeBSD is the way to go. With 
cablemodems slowly taking over the isp business, as it will. The 
need to rely on, on-site servers, will increase. I see FreeBSD 
having a great share in that. Small firms will be able to have file-
servers that are web servers, mail servers. With the added feature 
of knowing the files reside on thier premises.

	I am no unix guru as some people in the FreeBSD community 
know. But then I dont give up and die. The point is, that there are 
millions and i mean millions more, that know about 5% of what I 
know. 

	Having said that, the ultimate success for FreeBSD and the 
FreeBSD community lies in both marketing and in increased ready 
made software/solutions.

Lanny

> 
>   If the newcomer could easily see just how much is in common, they
> might realize that their choice was not as critical or irrevocable as they
> might think. It might help to convince newcomers that "BSD is a
> 'safe' choice, as is Linux" because most of the skills you learn and use
> can move immediately to the other platform.
>   Once convinced of that, it is possible to escape the "bandwagon shadow"
> of Linux and discuss the merits and uniqueness of BSD.

	I think you are forgetting one thing here. The average "joe" that 
works at a factory. Comes home to play on his/her pc. They are 
not interested in the merits of either or any unix system. They want 
to play games, use irc, look at pics...whatever. System 
Administrators, academics, people involved in networking and 
system sales are probably far more interested in the merits of 
FreeBSD. 
> 
> QUESTION
>   Do other BSDaemons think this idea has merit?
> Has it been done before?
> 
  Yeah,. Coke and Pepsi doit all the time on T.V....what is there 
advertising budget? Or was it Mazda and Mistubishi? I forgot. 

> I KNOW I WILL REGRET THIS BUT,
>   If there is support for this idea, I will volunteer to do it, or at
> least start it, with help from others, especially those more knowledgeable
> than myself.
> 
> SUMMARY
>   Unlike the path with Microsoft software,
	Microsoft is one of the worlds greatest marketing efforts. 

 a decision to use Linux does
> not preclude somebody from moving to BSD relatively easily - or
> vice-versa.
>   A choice in open source operating systems is a strength. It can
> help both BSD and Linux. My thought is to exploit that strength, and help
> people feel comfortable about choosing BSD.
> 
> Marty Cawthon
> ChipChat



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199810060452.AAA02803>