Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 21:44:52 -0400 From: "Michael P. Soulier" <msoulier@digitaltorque.ca> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: migrating to 64-bit Message-ID: <20060624014452.GT11625@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> In-Reply-To: <ef10de9a0606211152o3be3e502y91264ed01ed39fe@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060620233551.GG11625@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> <Pine.SOL.4.53.0606201958420.14129@brak> <20060621011340.GI11625@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> <ef10de9a0606210342y67ff7c61le018aa6ffdd48313@mail.gmail.com> <20060621173253.GD7596@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> <ef10de9a0606211152o3be3e502y91264ed01ed39fe@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--TiGNc3ldf20CNpkJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 21/06/06 Nikolas Britton said: > The consensus seems to be that FreeBSD/amd64 is a tad slower then > FreeBSD/i386 because it has to deal with 32 extra bits. The primary > reason to use FreeBSD/amd64 seems to be if you need greater then 4GB > of RAM. >=20 > This should give you the speed boost your looking for: > CPUTYPE?=3Dpentium2 > CFLAGS+=3D -mtune=3Dnocona > COPTFLAGS+=3D -mtune=3Dnocona >=20 > Put that in /etc/make.conf and recompile ports/kern/world. Cool, thanks. Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier <msoulier@digitaltorque.ca> "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --TiGNc3ldf20CNpkJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEnJkUKGqCc1vIvggRArwiAKCqHTxDobEJyg2TcSMv4KMZ947eZwCeNYEx m0LFloDsCD9NblFVMSBOHiE= =Qqcl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TiGNc3ldf20CNpkJ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060624014452.GT11625>