Date: 27 Oct 2001 00:03:29 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 64 bit times revisited.. Message-ID: <xzpd73arrda.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <xzpwv1itp1r.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <200110260006.f9Q05vQ05273@beastie.mckusick.com> <xzpwv1itp1r.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> writes: > FWIW, I add my vote to this option. There seems to be some confusion as to what I meant, so let me reword: I am in favor of switching time_t to 64-bit on *all* platforms in 5-CURRENT, and leaving 4-STABLE alone. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpd73arrda.fsf>