Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 5 Jun 1998 07:16:14 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Peter Dufault <dufault@hda.com>
To:        dyson@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: kernfs/procfs questions...
Message-ID:  <199806051116.HAA04969@hda.hda.com>
In-Reply-To: <199806042243.RAA00404@dyson.iquest.net> from "John S. Dyson" at "Jun 4, 98 05:43:51 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> echo "0" >/kernfs/net/inet/tcp/rfc1323
> 
> It is entirely bogus for the kernel to parse strings like this.  We
> probably do it, but that doesn't mean it's right... Even worse would be:

Sorry, "entirely bogus" is just too strong for me - I think this
should be "entirely irrelevant".

I have 48K microcontroller systems that you can hook up a terminal
too, hit CR six times "out of band", and they pop out of the usual
binary protocol into a mode where they can be configured in ASCII
(the ASCII is parsed into the binary protocol).  If I can afford
the overhead for parsing there we can afford the overhead in the
kernel.

The point is, I don't care if it is in the kernel or out of the
kernel if it is designed in a way that it could be in either place.

[ we now return to your regularly scheduled flame fest ... ]

Peter

-- 
Peter Dufault (dufault@hda.com)   Realtime development, Machine control,
HD Associates, Inc.               Safety critical systems, Agency approval

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806051116.HAA04969>