Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 31 Dec 1998 10:52:35 -0700
From:      Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
To:        Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>
Cc:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@ucb.crimea.ua>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Final upgrades of tools in 2.2-STABLE 
Message-ID:  <199812311752.KAA10143@mt.sri.com>
In-Reply-To: <199812310928.RAA90521@spinner.netplex.com.au>
References:  <14934.915095934@zippy.cdrom.com> <199812310928.RAA90521@spinner.netplex.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Personally I for upgrading both BIND and Sendmail.
> > > Most of people will run 2.2-STABLE for a long time
> > > until 3.0 will become stable.
> > 
> > And you're prepared to answer every single question from -stable
> > people who's DNS servers suddenly fall over? :)
> 
> And:  "Sendmail requires a version 8 config, /etc/sendmail.cf is only 
> version 7" etc etc.
> 
> As I said before, it requires a sendmail.cf rebuild and a bind 
> configuration file to be converted (with a script) to a new syntax.
> 
> This is not a light decision to take...

Agreed, but we made stuff like that happen in 2.1-stable for 2.2 that
required rebuilds of stuff, so the precedent is set and it didnt'
negatively affect folks as much.




Nate

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812311752.KAA10143>