Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 23:43:35 +0100 From: "Paolo Di Francesco" <paipai@tin.it> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net>, freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD version to base Sparc development on Message-ID: <19990413214044.FZCF5494.fep02-svc@harlock> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990413164029.4169b-100000@cygnus.rush.net> References: <19990413212101.FUBP27667.fep01-svc@harlock>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > CVS *IS* the solution. > it's the BEST solution, how do you plan on showing us diffs without > a compatible repository mechanism? > Well, I understand the problems, but I'm not interested in submitting the code. So from my _personal_ point of view I need a tool to download not to upload code. But, let's stop this topic.... > > > > Will this situation change in the future? (separate kernel package and > > > > user-land) > > > > > > The above URL will answer all your questions. > > > > > > > Personally, I prefer the one-big-package solution. But I think I'll set > > up CVS next weekend. ;) > > The simplest thing I found was to download the cvs repository, I'll get > you a cvsup file that explains how to do this as soon as I get my machines > up in working order. > Ok, thank you. > In the meanwhile check out /usr/share/examples/{cvs,cvsup} those > have files that will help you download your own cvs repository. > I'll read them. > btw, did we go over the issues about developing for -CURRENT instead of > for -STABLE about FIVE TIMES ALREADY? Let me reitirate (or just irritate): > > IF YOU DON'T DO IT FOR -CURRENT THEY WON'T TAKE THE PATCHES, THANK YOU. > I have a low persistence human-RAM... 8) I'll link to the -current branch as soon as possible. Ciao Ciao Paolo Di Francesco _ ->B<- All Recycled Bytes Message ... ~ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990413214044.FZCF5494.fep02-svc>