Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 09:10:55 -0500
From: Jacques Vidrine <n@nectar.cc>
To: TAOKA Satoshi <taoka@infonets.hiroshima-u.ac.jp>
Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Do you need editors/xemacs{,20} (Re: pending/11618: new port: editors/xemacs21)
Message-ID: <19990518141055.B09E41F6D@spawn.nectar.cc>
In-Reply-To: <19990518114404B.taoka@infonets.hiroshima-u.ac.jp>
References: <199905170012.RAA05550@freefall.freebsd.org> <19990518114404B.taoka@infonets.hiroshima-u.ac.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18 May 1999 at 11:44, TAOKA Satoshi <taoka@infonets.hiroshima-u.ac.jp>
wrote:
> Hi, XEmacs users.
>
> Do you need editors/xemacs{,20} ?
>
> I think these are deteted and editors/xemacs21 had better be imported
> as editors/xemacs.
I recommend that you ask asami@freebsd.org to repository copy
ports/editors/xemacs20 to ports/editors/xemacs21, and do your
port upgrade there. Only once xemacs21 has been available in
the ports tree for a while should you consider removing xemacs20
(which I use).
Unless you get other feedback to the contrary, I don't think that
there is much call for XEmacs 19 (ports/editors/xemacs) anymore.
XEmacs 20 is very mature.
Finally, in all cases, please contact the maintainers directly
before doing anything.
Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.cc / nectar@FreeBSD.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990518141055.B09E41F6D>