Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 16:22:19 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> To: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: no newgroup/newgrp in FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20010116162219.I364@ringworld.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <20010116161703.H364@ringworld.oblivion.bg>; from roam@orbitel.bg on Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 04:17:03PM %2B0200 References: <20010116161703.H364@ringworld.oblivion.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 04:17:03PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Heyas, > > Is there a reason there is no newgroup/newgrp(1) in FreeBSD, besides > the fact that the kernel can support a simultaneous set of groups? > Still, it would be nice for compatibility (and SUSv2 compliance) > to have some kind of newgrp/newgroup implementation, albeit even > a null one. > > On http://ringwraith.online.bg/~roam/devel/c/sysutils/newgrp-1.0.tar.gz Uhm. Oops. Remove the c/ part. http://ringwraith.online.bg/~roam/devel/sysutils/newgrp-1.0.tar.gz Sorry, and thanks to Chris Faulhaber for pointing this out. G'luck, Peter -- Thit sentence is not self-referential because "thit" is not a word. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010116162219.I364>